OBI WAN
01-25-05, 06:05 PM
Older models and a wait for new full-sizers have soured GM’s 2005 outlook.
The new generation of pickup trucks and sport-utility vehicles now in the product pipeline must be haunting the dreams of General Motors Corp. executives by now.
GM officials acknowledged that with the introduction of the new pickups still months away, the overall market flat or perhaps down a bit, and healthcare and material costs continuing to climb, both the company’s earnings and market share are under enormous pressure this year.
The automaker has already indicated, through its earning guidance for the coming year, that net income will drop by 50 percent in 2005 and its executives have decline to offer and predictions about market share.
Paul Ballew, GM executive director of market analysis, also told analysts GM was certain the new trucks and SUVs from the GMT 900 architecture will be a big hit once they reach the market. He also dismissed suggestions that the demand for full-size sport-utility vehicles is shrinking. Sales of full-size SUVs dropped 19 percent in December and were down by more than five percent for the full year, according to J.D. Power & Associates.
Ballew, however, blamed the decline on the problems of other manufacturers, he suggested. Ford’s Expedition simply hasn’t been a very successful vehicle, he added.
Consequently, while the growth of the full-size SUV segment has probably peaked, GM is confident that it will continue to hold a significant share of what will remain a significant market, Ballew said. GM still sees no evidence that rising gasoline prices have driven buyers out of the segment, he added.
Meanwhile, John Devine, GM’s chief financial officer, also told analysts that the company is cutting production through the first quarter. In fact, the company announced in this latest production report it was shutting temporarily both sides of its assembly complex inSpring Hill, Tennessee, as well as it assembly plant in Shreveport, Louisiana, to trim inventories. Both plants build newer products — the Colorado/Canyon pickups in Shreveport, and Saturn Vues and Ions in Spring Hill — that GM had been counting on to beef up its sales.
GM also plans to reduce production of its full-size sport-utility vehicles through the first quarter when the company said it will only break even or post a relatively small profit. With GMAC expected to continue to produce a handsome profit and positive contributions for Asia-Pacific and Latin America rolling in, the new guidance from the company clearly indicates that GM’s North American and European operations will continue to lose money, observer said.
Numbers adding up
GM’s global automotive operations earned $235 million in the fourth quarter, compared with $396 million a year earlier. GM’s North American automotive operations earned $416 million in the fourth quarter, up slightly from $397 million, due to cost cuts and tax settlements, partly offset by lower production.
“GM remains on Negative Outlook, with concerns focused on continuing margin compression in North American operations, losses in Europe, a dated truck portfolio that will not be refreshed through 2005, a weak car portfolio, rising capital costs, and very significant post-employment benefits. Although GM has made significant contributions to its pension funds and moved to greater prefunding of its healthcare liabilities, this has been accomplished to a large degree through asset sales and significantly higher debt levels,” Mark Oline, managing director of Fitch Corporate rating group, noted in a new report last week.
“It will be a long, hard year for GM North America, with only some new relatively low-margin products (Chevy Cobalt for example) to carry it through most of the year until the big cars (Cadillac DTS, Buick Lucerne) arrive in (the fourth quarter) and the GMT900 large SUVs launch in (the second quarter of 2006),” added John Casesa, Merrill Lynch’s automotive analyst in a separate report.
Devine insisted will look quite different once GM’s new truck program is finally put in motion.
GM, however, has not said with any precision when it plans to launch the new trucks and Devine declined to provide any guidance. Union representatives at the plants involved in the sweeping program said the planning for the launch has begun but GM has not said when the vehicles actually will begin rolling off the assembly lines. Devine, however, did indicate that the full-size SUVs will come first and the pickup trucks will follow.
Gary Cowger, president of GM North America, said in a recent interview it was impractical to try and pull ahead production of the new the trucks and SUVs because the program is so large.
The new generation of pickup trucks and sport-utility vehicles now in the product pipeline must be haunting the dreams of General Motors Corp. executives by now.
GM officials acknowledged that with the introduction of the new pickups still months away, the overall market flat or perhaps down a bit, and healthcare and material costs continuing to climb, both the company’s earnings and market share are under enormous pressure this year.
The automaker has already indicated, through its earning guidance for the coming year, that net income will drop by 50 percent in 2005 and its executives have decline to offer and predictions about market share.
Paul Ballew, GM executive director of market analysis, also told analysts GM was certain the new trucks and SUVs from the GMT 900 architecture will be a big hit once they reach the market. He also dismissed suggestions that the demand for full-size sport-utility vehicles is shrinking. Sales of full-size SUVs dropped 19 percent in December and were down by more than five percent for the full year, according to J.D. Power & Associates.
Ballew, however, blamed the decline on the problems of other manufacturers, he suggested. Ford’s Expedition simply hasn’t been a very successful vehicle, he added.
Consequently, while the growth of the full-size SUV segment has probably peaked, GM is confident that it will continue to hold a significant share of what will remain a significant market, Ballew said. GM still sees no evidence that rising gasoline prices have driven buyers out of the segment, he added.
Meanwhile, John Devine, GM’s chief financial officer, also told analysts that the company is cutting production through the first quarter. In fact, the company announced in this latest production report it was shutting temporarily both sides of its assembly complex inSpring Hill, Tennessee, as well as it assembly plant in Shreveport, Louisiana, to trim inventories. Both plants build newer products — the Colorado/Canyon pickups in Shreveport, and Saturn Vues and Ions in Spring Hill — that GM had been counting on to beef up its sales.
GM also plans to reduce production of its full-size sport-utility vehicles through the first quarter when the company said it will only break even or post a relatively small profit. With GMAC expected to continue to produce a handsome profit and positive contributions for Asia-Pacific and Latin America rolling in, the new guidance from the company clearly indicates that GM’s North American and European operations will continue to lose money, observer said.
Numbers adding up
GM’s global automotive operations earned $235 million in the fourth quarter, compared with $396 million a year earlier. GM’s North American automotive operations earned $416 million in the fourth quarter, up slightly from $397 million, due to cost cuts and tax settlements, partly offset by lower production.
“GM remains on Negative Outlook, with concerns focused on continuing margin compression in North American operations, losses in Europe, a dated truck portfolio that will not be refreshed through 2005, a weak car portfolio, rising capital costs, and very significant post-employment benefits. Although GM has made significant contributions to its pension funds and moved to greater prefunding of its healthcare liabilities, this has been accomplished to a large degree through asset sales and significantly higher debt levels,” Mark Oline, managing director of Fitch Corporate rating group, noted in a new report last week.
“It will be a long, hard year for GM North America, with only some new relatively low-margin products (Chevy Cobalt for example) to carry it through most of the year until the big cars (Cadillac DTS, Buick Lucerne) arrive in (the fourth quarter) and the GMT900 large SUVs launch in (the second quarter of 2006),” added John Casesa, Merrill Lynch’s automotive analyst in a separate report.
Devine insisted will look quite different once GM’s new truck program is finally put in motion.
GM, however, has not said with any precision when it plans to launch the new trucks and Devine declined to provide any guidance. Union representatives at the plants involved in the sweeping program said the planning for the launch has begun but GM has not said when the vehicles actually will begin rolling off the assembly lines. Devine, however, did indicate that the full-size SUVs will come first and the pickup trucks will follow.
Gary Cowger, president of GM North America, said in a recent interview it was impractical to try and pull ahead production of the new the trucks and SUVs because the program is so large.