OBI WAN
02-13-05, 08:00 PM
Has anyone ever seen a **** eating grin???????
If ya ever wondered how it looks, just come over here and see for yourselfs!!!
Some members know about me and a certian company and our standings between the 2 of us. I used to on a regular basis insult, flame, demean, discredit etc a particular company only to get ganged up upon. As time passed this multiple gangings up on myself grew larger while the lies on the other side grew even deeper into ****.
This next part was posted awhile back in which I highly stated with proof of what a lie this all was.
"""""""XBLAZINLV DYNO #'S
414 RWHP and 506 RWTQ @ 11.1 psi
I'll post the dyno sheets later.
That was Mike's engine with our Stage II short block and Stage III stock valve diameter heads. Also a new camshaft design that I have been working on for the turbo applications. Our turbo kit with a 60-1 Innovative turbo
We also did some more calibration work in the fuel department. So even with that much power we are at 88-90 psi of FP.
His Blazer will dust my Blazer, no problem, and we know mine goes 13.5 @ 104 with BullSh1t radial tires on a no boost launch. I know for sure with a full boost lanuch and slicks my Blazer will do 13.00 to maybe a high 12.9 pass at 105-106 mph."""""
Ok finally yesterday the bandit gives up this:
""""So yes the dyno numbers were a lie.....I covered for them because I thought my truck was really put on a dyno, but in reality they used the air flow numbers off of auto tap to try and estimate a HP number. I was never faxed dyno slips or any of that.""""
And autotap doesnt display actual CFM numbers to begin with! WHat it does give out for info isnt and accurate account of air flow since so many variables are in place!!!
Then we also find out that a Gtech was used to post 1/4 et times!!!
That was a hard one because the original run of the Blazer here in question ran a 17.4 and then was regarded to run low 13's. OK you do the math.10 h.p. at 15 seconds in a 1/4 equates to .1 tenth in a gain. As the et lowers mass weight etc begins to compound the equation so by 14 seconds flat it takes over 15 h.p. to gain a .1 tenth and so on. SO this 17.4 second factory Blazer which would need in excess of 500 h.p. to drop from 17.4 to 13 seconds does it with 300 h.p. added from a autotap reading.
CAN YA HEAR ME NOW!!! HE'S EVERY BIT THE LIAR I CLAIMED HIM TO BE FROM SQUARE ONE IN THE YEAR 2000!!!:p:D:rolleyes:
If ya ever wondered how it looks, just come over here and see for yourselfs!!!
Some members know about me and a certian company and our standings between the 2 of us. I used to on a regular basis insult, flame, demean, discredit etc a particular company only to get ganged up upon. As time passed this multiple gangings up on myself grew larger while the lies on the other side grew even deeper into ****.
This next part was posted awhile back in which I highly stated with proof of what a lie this all was.
"""""""XBLAZINLV DYNO #'S
414 RWHP and 506 RWTQ @ 11.1 psi
I'll post the dyno sheets later.
That was Mike's engine with our Stage II short block and Stage III stock valve diameter heads. Also a new camshaft design that I have been working on for the turbo applications. Our turbo kit with a 60-1 Innovative turbo
We also did some more calibration work in the fuel department. So even with that much power we are at 88-90 psi of FP.
His Blazer will dust my Blazer, no problem, and we know mine goes 13.5 @ 104 with BullSh1t radial tires on a no boost launch. I know for sure with a full boost lanuch and slicks my Blazer will do 13.00 to maybe a high 12.9 pass at 105-106 mph."""""
Ok finally yesterday the bandit gives up this:
""""So yes the dyno numbers were a lie.....I covered for them because I thought my truck was really put on a dyno, but in reality they used the air flow numbers off of auto tap to try and estimate a HP number. I was never faxed dyno slips or any of that.""""
And autotap doesnt display actual CFM numbers to begin with! WHat it does give out for info isnt and accurate account of air flow since so many variables are in place!!!
Then we also find out that a Gtech was used to post 1/4 et times!!!
That was a hard one because the original run of the Blazer here in question ran a 17.4 and then was regarded to run low 13's. OK you do the math.10 h.p. at 15 seconds in a 1/4 equates to .1 tenth in a gain. As the et lowers mass weight etc begins to compound the equation so by 14 seconds flat it takes over 15 h.p. to gain a .1 tenth and so on. SO this 17.4 second factory Blazer which would need in excess of 500 h.p. to drop from 17.4 to 13 seconds does it with 300 h.p. added from a autotap reading.
CAN YA HEAR ME NOW!!! HE'S EVERY BIT THE LIAR I CLAIMED HIM TO BE FROM SQUARE ONE IN THE YEAR 2000!!!:p:D:rolleyes: